June 26, 2023

    Choosing Between NIST and CIS: A Practical Guide for Resource-Constrained Teams

    When the next step to becoming secure seems ambiguous, a framework can give you the confidence to move forward with clarity. Serving as a guide, it will highlight the gaps in your security program and offer a baseline of controls that you can prioritize.

    For IT teams looking to improve their security posture, choosing between the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and CIS Controls can feel overwhelming. At Blumira, we regularly help organizations navigate this decision. Let's break down these frameworks in practical terms to help you make the right choice for your team.

    The Key Differences at a Glance

    NIST Cybersecurity Framework:


    • More flexible and adaptable
    • Focus on overall risk management
    • Six core functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover
    • Great for organizations that need customization

    CIS Controls:

    More prescriptive and actionable
    Focus on specific security controls
    18 control categories with concrete implementation steps
    Ideal for teams seeking clear, direct guidance
    Well-suited for organizations just starting their security journey

    Which Framework Fits Your Reality?

    Consider NIST If:

    You need flexibility to adapt security controls to your environment
    Your industry has specific compliance requirements
    You want to build a comprehensive security program over time
    You have some security expertise on your team
    You're looking to mature your security practices gradually

    Consider CIS If:

    You want clear, specific guidance on what to implement
    You're starting from scratch with security
    You have limited security expertise in-house
    You need quick wins and clear progress markers
    You prefer step-by-step implementation instructions

    The Real-World Impact
    Based on our experience with customers, here's what we typically see:
    NIST Success Story: A mid-sized healthcare provider chose NIST because it aligned well with their HIPAA requirements. They appreciated the framework's flexibility, which allowed them to prioritize controls based on their specific risks while meeting compliance needs.

    CIS Success Story: A small manufacturing firm with a two-person IT team found CIS Controls ideal because it gave them clear, prioritized steps to improve their security posture without requiring extensive security expertise.
    Making It Work With Limited Resources
    Whichever framework you choose, here are some practical tips for implementation:

    Start Small: Focus on the most critical controls first
    Automate Where Possible: Use tools that can automate monitoring and response
    Document As You Go: Make documentation part of your daily process
    Leverage Existing Tools: Look for ways your current tools support framework requirements
    Focus on Outcomes: Don't get lost in the process - keep sight of security goals

    The Bottom Line
    There's no one-size-fits-all answer, but here's our guidance: If you're just starting out and need clear direction, CIS Controls might be your best bet. If you need more flexibility and have some security maturity, NIST could be the better choice.
    Remember, the goal isn't perfect implementation of either framework - it's improving your security posture in a way that works for your organization's resources and needs.
    Want to learn more about how Blumira can help you implement either framework effectively? Check out our platform's capabilities or schedule a demo with our team. If you're specifically interested in diving deeper, explore our comprehensive

    NIST Cybersecurity Framework guide.

    NIST vs. CIS: How To Choose a Cybersecurity Framework

    Participants

    Wolfgang Goerlich, Advisory CISO, Duo SecurityWolfgang Goerlich, Advisory CISO, Duo Security

    Wolf is an Advisory CISO of Duo Security, the leading provider of unified access security and multi-factor authentication delivered through the cloud. He has held senior management roles in IT and IT security in the financial services and healthcare verticals. In addition, Wolf has held senior leadership roles in consulting firms specializing in identity and access management, governance risk and compliance, and security programs. Wolf advises clients primarily in risk management, incident response, business continuity, and secure development.

    Mike Toole, Head of Security and IT, BlumiraMike Toole, Head of Security and IT, Blumira

    Mike, Head of Security and IT at Blumira, has over a decade of experience in IT. Prior to joining Blumira, he managed IT for Duo Security and Censys. He has broad experience with a range of IT and security focus areas, including compliance, network design, log monitoring, project management, and cross-platform IT.

    Erica Mixon

    Erica is an award-winning writer, editor and journalist with over ten years of experience in the digital publishing industry. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in writing, literature and publishing from Emerson College. Her foray into technology began at TechTarget, where she provided editorial coverage on a wide variety...

    More from the blog

    View All Posts